Introducing the Aotearoa NZ Catastrophe Resilience Project (NZCat)

This post introduces the Aotearoa NZ Catastrophe Resilience Project (NZCat), and outlines the aims, methods, and results of the project. You can read a range of project blogs here.

Update Aug 2024: See our presentation to the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment on their NZ Fuel Security Study

Update Nov 2023: You can now read the Main Report for 2023 (PDF, 118 pages).

Update Oct 2023: The NZCat Webinar took place on 25 Oct. Matt presented high-level project findings followed by expert panel discussion, attended by an audience of diverse agencies.

Update Sept 2023: We have completed our interview study and report expert insights on NZ’s resilience.

Update July 2023: A list of academic papers on existential risk and nuclear war/winter produced by the project team.

Update June 2023: We have completed our survey of experts on Nuclear risk and NZ.

Update Feb 2023: We have completed our NZ and Nuclear War/Winter Workshop.

Update Jan 2023: We have produced a NZ nuclear war/winter Hazard Profile.

Why this project?

Global catastrophic risks include nuclear war, extreme pandemics, and supervolcanic eruptions, among other threats. Research, and recent experiences with disasters such as the Covid-19 pandemic and Russian invasion of Ukraine, indicate that should global catastrophes eventuate, the cascading global impacts could be severe.

The consequences could be devastating for Aotearoa NZ, plausibly making it difficult to sustain industrial society and difficult for NZ agriculture to continue producing the huge food excess which would help feed the world in a global catastrophe. This thinking runs counter to some views that ‘safe havens’ like NZ or Australia might be relatively less impacted in some global catastrophes.

The risk is that a major catastrophe disrupts climate, trade, or other global systems, to the point that industry is unable to function, leading to massive food, energy, manufacturing, and societal disruption.

The NZCat project draws inspiration from the concept of island refuges for mitigating existential risks to humanity. A suitably robust island might increase the probability that humanity survives even the greatest global catastrophes.

Project Aim

To demonstrably nudge government towards addressing these risks. Steps towards this include understanding the impact representative major global catastrophes might have on Aotearoa NZ, for example a Northern Hemisphere nuclear war. We also aim to identify the adaptive strategies and plans that might mitigate these effects, ensuring that industrial society can continue.

Project Team

The NZCat project team consists of three co-investigators plus collaborators. We will work with with Think Tanks, Academic Researchers, Policy Professionals, Industry, and the Public Sector through the 12-month duration of the project.

Dr Matt Boyd

Matt is an independent researcher who completed his PhD in philosophy. He founded Adapt Research in 2015. Matt has researched health, technology, and catastrophic risk for a decade and published over 40 peer-reviewed academic papers. His recent work has focused on national risk processes, nuclear winter, and global health security.

Professor Nick Wilson

Nick is a research professor of public health with research interests that include refuges to mitigate pandemic disease and nuclear war. Nick contributed to work for the Commission for the Future on Nuclear Disaster as far back as 1982. He has over 500 Medline-indexed research publications.

Dr Ben Payne

Ben is an experienced risk professional who completed his PhD in geography. Ben was Lead Scientific Officer with the Global Risk Research-Agenda Development Group of the UNDRR/International Science Council in producing A Framework for Global Science. He has also worked with Massey University’s Joint Centre for Disaster Research.

Sam Ragnarsson

Sam is a Principal Data and Information expert with extensive experience in working on complex national issues that rely on data and future technology. Sam has a strong background in strategic alignment, risk management, and interagency collaboration, with a focus on data interoperability and the integration of emerging technologies.

Timeline

The project began in November 2022. Initial planning days invited advice from risk professionals with established interests in global catastrophe and Aotearoa. Following planning there are four phases:

  • Phase I saw us develop a National Risk Assessment Hazard Profile for a representative global catastrophe (nuclear war/nuclear winter).
  • Phase II involved a workshop to validate the hazard profile, assess knowledge gaps, and design mixed method data collection using surveys and interview methodology. Some of these approaches are based on the 1987 NZ Nuclear Impacts Study.
  • Phase III is where we reached out with a survey and interviews of knowledge holders across industry, the public sector and academia, including interviews. We collected data that paints a rich picture of the likely impacts of nuclear disaster on NZ society and industry, along with crowdsourced adaptive responses, mitigation strategies, and possible plans. We’ve reported the survey findings here, and blogged here.
  • Phase IV involved an open webinar and expert panel discussion about findings to date, priority policy needs, and mitigation measures.
  • Dissemination & Engagement through research papers, presentations, blogs, policy recommendations, and shadow Ministerial briefings continues in 2024. Check this site for updates and subscribe to our blog.

Project Goals

The goal is to generate productive discussion, concrete solution ideas, and map a pathway to ongoing and robust analysis of global catastrophic and human existential risk and its relationship to Aotearoa NZ.

Along the way we will provide submissions and policy advice to existing government initiatives, for example our submission to the Productivity Commission on global catastrophe and economic resilience was one of three consultation submissions the NZCat team has made.

We aim to connect our work in logical and, where possible, generalisable ways with catastrophe resilience work being undertaken across other island jurisdictions, with potential to leverage synergies with continental Australia, Tasmania, Indonesia, Iceland, or others, in the future. Our work exploring minimum agricultural inputs could inform many global post-catastrophe food strategies.